A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN WEIGHING AND IMAGE ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES FOR PREDICTING THE AMOUNT OF DEPOSITED ELECTROSPUN NANOFIBRES
Weighing and direct measurement are currently the two most common techniques used for estimating the amount of deposited nanofibres in electrospinning process. Nevertheless, due to its extremely small fibre size and mass, the task of measuring the weight or thickness of an electrospun nanofibres membrane is difficult and the results are arguable. This study evaluates the effectiveness of using greyscale image analysis for predicting the amount of deposited nanofibres compared to weighing technique. Polyvinyl alcohol electrospun nanofibres were collected at different deposition times on A4 black paper substrates. The substrates were weighed before and after deposition process and then scanned into 8 bit greyscale images. Analyses were carried out using ImageJ software, statistical analysis, high speed camera and scanning electron microscopy. At long deposition times, both techniques showed significant correlations between the measured values and deposition times. However, at short deposition times the weighing technique was found unreliable (p>0.05) compared to image analysis technique due to insignificant fibre masses compared to the weight variation of the substrates. Results suggest that image analysis technique was a better option to be used compared to weighing technique. This technique has the potential to be used as an automated online quality control in electrospun nanofibres manufacture.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer copyright to the publisher as part of a journal publishing agreement with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the manuscript is accepted, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).