THE PERFORMANCES OF COATED CUTTING TOOLS IN MILLING DAC52 ON SURFACE INTEGRITY
Machining of hardened steel in die and mould making has been intensively used in recent years. Various coated carbide tools have been developed to improve the performance, quality and efficiency in machining hardened steel. Now, hardened steel products tend to have poor quality surface finish and cause major loss for the company. The purpose of this research is to investigate the performance of surface roughness of coated cutting tool on steel DAC52 under dry conditions. Machining process was carried out by using CNC milling machine under side milling operation by using three types of coated cutting tools. The measurement of images’ microstructure, white layer and microcrack was done under Optical Microscope. The values of surface roughness were tested using Mitutoyo surface roughness tester while microhardness values were tested by using Vickers microhardness tester. The highest value of surface roughness was found when gold coated cutting tool was milled with DAC52, which is 0.40 µm, while the blue coated cutting tool produced higher length of microcrack which is 50 µm. In conclusion, the blue coated cutting tool is the best tool to be selected as a tool to be machined, because the tool produces less defect such as microcrack or white layer.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer copyright to the publisher as part of a journal publishing agreement with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the manuscript is accepted, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).