Technological Perceptions on Human Technology Interaction (HTI) in Navigation Operation of Merchant Ships
This paper highlighted the perception of seafarers on Human Technology Interaction (HTI) in the navigation operation of merchant ships. From the review of the literatures, weaknesses related to HTI in the current practice of navigation were found. Most common errors found were over reliance on technology, misinterpretations of data and careless usage of technology. Due to these weaknesses, a survey titled ‘The Technological Perception on Human Technology Interaction (HTI) for Navigation of Merchant Shipping’ was conducted focusing on the perception of officers in handling the technological equipment during the navigation operation. The survey involved 97 officers of merchant ships from two major shipping companies in Asia. Among the findings were 56% officers agreed that accident happened frequently due to misinterpretation of data provided by the technological equipment. About 67% of officers agreed that logic diagrams should be provided for equipment. Recommendations were made such as to provide logic diagrams showing the relationship between the equipment and the system. A clear policy on the use of technology particularly for navigation operation should be developed especially the trend of future ships are more technologically inclined. Lastly, there is a need to explore the ergonomic compatibility for effectively eliminating the HTI errors.
B.M. Batalden and A.K. Sydnes, “Maritime safety and the ISM code: a study of investigated casualties and incidents,” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3-25, 2014.
J. Weng and D. Yang, “Investigation of shipping accident injury severity and mortality,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 76, pp. 92-101, 2015.
F. Goerlandt and J. Montewka, “Maritime transportation risk analysis: Review and analysis in light of some foundational issues,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 138, pp. 115-134, 2015.
C. Chauvin, S. Lardjane, G. Morel, J.P. Clostermann and B. Langard, “Human and organizational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 59, pp. 26-37, 2013.
Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty. (2017). Safety and Shipping Review: An annual review of trends and developments in shipping losses and safety [Online]. Available:
K. Pleskacz, “Impact of automation on ship’s safety”, Scientific Journal, vol. 26, pp. 88-91, 2011.
E. Bal, O. Arslan and L. Tavacioglu, “Prioritization of the causal factors of fatigue in seafarers and measurement of fatigue with the application of the Lactate Test,” Safety Science, vol. 72, pp. 46-54, 2015.
A.M. Goulielmos, G. Lathouraki and C. Giziakis, “The quest of marine accidents due to human error, 1998 – 2011,” International Journal of Emergency Services, vol. 1, pp. 39-70, 2012.
M.J. Akhtar and I.B. Utne, “Human fatigue’s effect on the risk of maritime groundings – A Bayesian Network modelling approach,” Safety Science, vol. 62, pp. 427-440, 2014.
A. Harati-Mokhtari, A. Wall, P. Brooks and J. Wang, “Automatic Identification System (AIS): Data reliability and human error implications,” Journal of Navigation, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 373-384, 2007.
International Maritime Organization (IMO). (1995). Performance Standards for Automatic Radar Plotting Aids (ARPAs) [Online]. Available: http://www.sjofartsverket.se/upload/5121/823.pdf
M.C. Tsou and C.K. Hsueh, “The study of ship collision avoidance route planning by ant colony algorithm,” Journal of Marine Science and Technology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 746-756, 2009.
American Bureau of Shipping (ABS). (2014). Guidance notes on The Application of Ergonomics to Marine Systems [Online]. Available:
A. Maldonado, J.L. Garcia, A. Alvarado and C.O. Balderrama, “A hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design methodology for ergonomics compatibility evaluation of advance manufacturing technology,” International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology, vol. 66, no. 1-4, pp. 171-186, 2012.
U. Meck, S. Stroschneider and U. Bruggemann, “Interaction design in shipbuilding: An investigation into the integration of the users’ perspective into ship bridge design,” Journal of Maritime Research, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15-32, 2014.
A. Maldonado, J. Sanchez, S. Noriega, J.J. Diaz, J.L. Garcia and L. Vidal, “A hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design survey for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology – AMT,” in XXIst Annual International Occupational Ergonomics and Safety Conference, Dallas, Texas, 2009, pp. 270- 277.
S.T. Chen, A. Wall, P. Davies, J. Yang and Y.H. Chou, “A Human and Organizational Factors (HOFs) analysis method for marine casualties using HFACS – Maritime Accidents (HFACS – MA),” Safety Science, vol. 60, pp. 105-114, Dec. 2013.
S. Shappell. (2005). The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) [Online]. Available: http://www.flighttestsafety.org/images/stories/workshop/2009Apr/Shappell-HFACS-HFIX.pdf.
Akademi Laut Malaysia (ALAM) (2017). Akademi Laut Malaysia Course Calendar 2017 [Online]. Available: http://www.alam.edu.my/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Course-Calendar-2017.pdf.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer copyright to the publisher as part of a journal publishing agreement with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the manuscript is accepted, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).