• Ikuobase Emovon


Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a risk analysis tool which is used to define, identify, and eliminate known and/or potential failures from a system. The task is generally performed by team of experts. Each of the team of experts can express diverse opinions in rating of failure modes of systems which may be in the form of precise data and imprecise distribution ratings. However the RPN of FMEA is incapable of using these various forms of information in the prioritisation of risk of failure modes. This is one of the main limitations of FMEA. Furthermore the technique is limited to the use of three decision criteria thereby excluding other important decision criteria such as production loss in prioritising risk. To address these problems a novel FMEA tool is proposed which combines Dempster Shafer Theory with the ELECTRE method to provide a more efficient failure mode prioritisation method. With this technique the Dempster Shafer Theory is used in aggregating different failure mode ratings from experts and the ELECTRE method is applied in the ranking of failure modes. The applicability of the proposed technique is demonstrated with a case study of a marine diesel engine. Results showed that the proposed method can be applied in addressing risk prioritisation problem more efficiently than the FMEA and its variant.


Download data is not yet available.


A. Pillay, and J. Wang, “Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 69-85, //, 2003.

I. Emovon, R. A. Norman, and A. J. Murphy, "A new Tool for Prioritising the Risk of Failure Modes for Marine Machinery Systems."

Y. Du, H. Mo, X. Deng, R. Sadiq, and Y. Deng, “A new method in failure mode and effects analysis based on evidential reasoning,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-10, 2014.

J. Yang, H.-Z. Huang, L.-P. He, S.-P. Zhu, and D. Wen, “Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis of aircraft turbine rotor blades using Dempster–Shafer evidence theory under uncertainty,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 2084-2092, 2011.

X. Su, Y. Deng, S. Mahadevan, and Q. Bao, “An improved method for risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis of aircraft engine rotor blades,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 26, no. 0, pp. 164-174, 2012

M. Braglia, “MAFMA: Multi-attribute failure mode analysis,” International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1017-1034., 2000.

F. Zammori, and R. Gabbrielli, “ANP/RPN: A multi criteria evaluation of the risk priority number,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 85-104, 2012.

K. Maheswaran, and T. Loganathan, “A Novel Approach for Prioritisation of Failure modes in FMEA using MCDM,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 733-739, 2013.

K. Cicek, and M. Celik, “Application of failure modes and effects analysis to main engine crankcase explosion failure on-board ship,” Safety Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 6-10, 2013.

A. P. Dempster, “Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping,” The annals of mathematical statistics, pp. 325-339, 1967.

G. Shafer, "Mathematical theory of evidence.," Princeton University, 1976.

U. K. Rakowsky, and U. Gocht, “Reasoning in reliability-centred maintenance based on a Dempster—Shafer approach,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability, vol. 222, no. 4, pp. 605-612, 2008.

D. D. Wu, “Supplier selection in a fuzzy group setting: A method using grey related analysis and Dempster–Shafer theory,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 8892-8899, 2009.

B. Roy, and P. Vincke, “Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 207-218, 1981.

A. Shanian, A. S. Milani, C. Carson, and R. C. Abeyaratne, “A new application of ELECTRE III and revised Simos’ procedure for group material selection under weighting uncertainty,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 709-720, 2008.

M. Sevkli, “An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3393-3405, 2010.

L. Anojkumar, M. Ilangkumaran, and V. Sasirekha, “Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2964-2980, 2014.

C. Dong, C. Yuan, Z. Liu, and X. Yan, “Marine Propulsion System Reliability Research Based on Fault Tree Analysis,” Advanced Shipping and Ocean Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27-33, 2013.

I. Emovon, R. A. Norman, and A. J. Murphy, “Hybrid MCDM based methodology for selecting the optimum maintenance strategy for ship machinery systems,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, pp. 1-13, 2015.

K. Cicek, H. H. Turan, Y. I. Topcu, and M. N. Searslan, "Risk-based preventive maintenance planning using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) for marine engine systems."

America Bureau of Shipping, "Guidance note on Reliability-Centered Maintence," America Bureau of Shipping, 2004.

A. Bejger, “An analysis of chosen engine failures of the "Seismic Research" type ship,” Journal of Polish CIMAC, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9-14, 2011.

C. Dunford, “Crankshaft purpose, design and modes of failure,” CSL Technical focus, no. 2, pp. 1-5, 2011.

A. J. Mokashi, J. Wang, and A. K. Vermar, “A study of reliability-centred maintenance in maritime operations,” Marine Policy, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 325-335, //, 2002.

How to Cite
Emovon, I. (2016). FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS OF SHIP SYSTEMS USING AN INTEGRATED DEMPSTER SHAFER THEORY AND ELECTRE METHOD. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology (JAMT), 10(1), 45-60. Retrieved from