Quality and Yield Improvement of Barrel Tin Plating Process for SMX Semiconductor Packages
Abstract
Most of semiconductor solderability improvement is done using tin. The tin plating can be done in lead frame or barrel. Barrel tin electroplating process for Surface Mount X (SMX) semiconductor packages has a distinct advantage: the ability to finish a greater volume of work for a specified time period. However, as the SMX packages are applied in critical automotive and medical fields, barrel tin plating also faces yield and quality challenges. This work discusses the common rejects and some solutions to improve the quality and yield of barrel tin plating process for SubMinitature version B (SMB) semiconductor packages. Among the common rejects are missing plating, burn mark, unit coupling, lead discoloration and crack package. The improvement efforts are the introduction of metal ballast to improve conductivity and reduce missing plating, improvement of solution filtration to avoid discoloration, addition of ‘Zig-zag balls’ to reduce unit coupling, auto tracking of ampere spike that causes crack package and vision system to further screen out rejects. As a result, SMX barrel plating yield can be increased to more than 99.8% and there are continuous effort to further improve yield and quality.
Downloads
References
J. Dufour, An Introduction to Metallurgy, 4th Edition. New York: Cameron, 2006.
J. Horner, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2004.
A. C. Tan, Tin and Solder Plating in the Semiconductor Industry: A Technical Guide. London: Chapman and Hall, 1993.
J. G. Donaldson, “Continuous strip plating of electronic components”, Metal Finishing, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 642-655, 1999.
R. Singleton, “Barrel plating”, Metal Finishing, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 346–367, 1999.
S. M. Schottky. (2017). SMB case 403a power rectifier [Online]. Available: http://www.onsemi.com/pub/Collateral/MBRS140T3-D.PDF
R. Singleton, and E. Singleton, “Fundamentals of barrel plating”, Metal Finishing, vol. 8, no 109, pp. 14–22, 2011.
A. J. Cobley, J. Halut and P. Negre, “Ultrasonic agitation in barrel electroplating: Field trial results”, The International Journal of Surface Engineering and Coatings, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 171-175, 2015.
M. K. Basha and Y. H. Yeoh, Reduction of SMB Pb-Free Units Coupling in Barrel Plating. Seremban: ON Semiconductor, 2008.
S. K. Land, D. B. Smith and J. W. Walz, Practical Support for Lean Six Sigma Software Process Definition: Using IEEE Software Engineering Standards. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
S. K. S. Nadarajan, “Effective maintenance strategy to improve performance through RCM concept”, in 36th International Electronics Manufacturing Technology Conference, Johor Bahru, 2014, pp. 1–9.
W. Cavanaugh and J. Langan, “Solderability of electrodeposits”, Plating, vol. 57, pp. 45-47. 1970.
F. Altmayer. (2004). Barrel plating blues. products finishing [Online]. Available: https://www.pfonline.com/articles/barrel-plating-blues
E. Dunigan. (2012). Troubleshooting guide for tin plating [Online]. Available: http://www.thefinishingexperts.com/knowledgebase/troubleshooting-guide-for-tin-plating/
D. Pletcher and F. C. Walsh, Industrial Electrochemistry. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1992.
F. C. Walsh and C. Ponce de Leon, “Versatile electrochemical coatings and surface layers from aqueous methanesulfonic acid”, Surface & Coatings Technology, vol. 259, pp. 676-697, 2014.
G. Harsanyi. “Electrochemical processes resulting in migrated short failures in microcircuits”, IEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology, vol. 18, no.3, pp. 602–610, 1995.
J. Rethinam, S. Sriveeraraghavan, S. Jayakrishnan, S. Sethumadhavan, S. Ramesh, V. Sriram and R. M. Krishnan, “Electroplating of nickel using a modified barrel design”, The International Journal of Surface Engineering and Coatings, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 179-181, 1996.
