Capacity Planning and Product Allocations under Testing Time Uncertainty in Electronic Industry
This research was conducted in a multinational hard disk drive manufacturer in Malaysia facing problem of low utilization in automatic testing process. High volumes, high product mix, short life cycle, and long testing duration compound to the existing problem. The automatic tester is called mixed – load tester because of its ability that can load and unload multiple product families simultaneously. Currently, the planner often conducts re-adjustment capacity planning and allocation because of uncertain testing time. The research has objective to optimize the number of testers while achieving the production target under testing time uncertainty in order to improve tester utilization. To handle the uncertainty, robust optimization was employed in the mixed – load tester model. The result shows this proposed model permits adjustment of company`s production manager`s and capacity planner`s attitude towards testing time uncertainty through the robust parameter.
U. K. Yusof and S. Deris, “Optimizing machine utilization in semiconductor assembly industry using constraint-chromosome genetic algorithm,” in 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology, 2010, pp. 601–606.
W. Hopp and M. L. Spearman, Factory Physics, Second. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000.
A. Dolgui, O. B. E. N. Ammar, F. Hnaien, and M. A. O. Louly, “A State of the Art on Supply Planning and Inventory Control under Lead Time Uncertainty,” Stud. Informatics Control, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 255–268, 2013.
C. Martínez-Costa, M. Mas-Machuca, E. Benedito, and A. Corominas, “A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 153, pp. 66–85, 2014.
N. Dellaert, E. Cayiroglu, and J. Jeunet, “Assessing and controlling the impact of hospital capacity planning on the waiting time,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 2203–2214, 2015.
M. Haddadzade, M. R. Razfar, and M. H. F. Zarandi, “Integration of process planning and job shop scheduling with stochastic processing time,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 71, no. 1–4, pp. 241–252, 2013.
N. B. Kacar, L. Mönch, R. Uzsoy, and S. Member, “Modeling Cycle Times in Production Planning Models for Wafer Fabrication,” IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 153–167, 2016.
H. Lin, “Investing in lead-time variability reduction in a collaborative vendor – buyer supply chain model with stochastic lead time,” Comput. Oper. Res., vol. 72, pp. 43–49, 2016.
H. M. Asih and K. E. Chong, “Throughput and Tester Utilization Improvement in the Hard Disk Drive Assembly Line Using Hybrid Simulation Approach,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 455–459, 2014.
D. Bertsimas and M. Sim, “Robust Discrete Optimization and Network Flows,” Math. Program., vol. 98, no. 1–3, pp. 49–71, 2003.
Y. Lou, Y. Yin, and S. Lawphongpanich, “Robust Approach to Discrete Network Designs with Demand Uncertainty,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2090, pp. 86–94, 2009.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors transfer copyright to the publisher as part of a journal publishing agreement with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after the manuscript is accepted, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).